Distinction between Tort and Contract, Tort and Crime

3 min read

Foundational Distinctions in Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence: Tort, Contract, and Crime #

For a comprehensive understanding of the Law of Torts, it is jurisprudentially essential to delineate its boundaries against other core areas of law, namely Contract Law and Criminal Law.

I. Distinction Between Tort and Breach of Contract #

Both Tort and Breach of Contract fall under the purview of civil law, where the injured party is the claimant. However, they differ fundamentally in the source of the duty, the nature of the wrong, and the character of the remedy.

Aspect	Tort	Breach of Contract
1. Nature of Right Violated	Violation of right in rem (against all persons generally).	Violation of right in personam (against a specific person).
2. Source of Duty	Imposed by law independently of consent.	Created by consent of the parties (agreement).
3. Damages	Always unliquidated (assessed by court).	Liquidated or pre-determined (fixed in the contract).
4. Foreseeability of Loss	No limitation — defendant liable for all natural and probable consequences.	Limited to losses reasonably foreseeable or notified to the other party.
5. Measure / Type of Damages	May be nominal, exemplary, or contemptuous depending on circumstances.	Generally compensatory — equivalent to actual loss.
6. Motive	Generally irrelevant to liability.	Relevant in assessing breach and intention.
7. Vicarious Liability	Applicable — master may be liable for servant’s tort.	Not applicable — each party liable only for their own breach.
8. Overlap / Co-existence	Same act may be both tort and contract (e.g., doctor’s negligence).	Same as left — both actions may arise simultaneously.
9. Criminal Nature	Some torts may also be crimes (e.g., defamation, nuisance).	Breach of contract is never a crime.

II. Distinction Between Tort and Crime

Criminal Law and the Law of Torts diverge significantly in their purpose, parties, proceedings, and consequences, representing the fundamental split between public and private law.

Aspect	Law of Torts (Civil Wrong)	Criminal Law (Public Wrong)
1. Primary Object	Compensation and redress for the individual claimant (restitutio in integrum).	Punishment and general deterrence to protect the collective public interest.
2. Proceedings and Parties	The action is instituted by the injured private party (claimant) against the wrongdoer (defendant).	The action is instituted by the State (Prosecution) against the accused.
3. Burden of Proof	Proof is required on the balance of probabilities (i.e., that it is more likely than not that the wrong occurred).	Proof is required beyond reasonable doubt, reflecting the seriousness of the penalty (e.g., incarceration).
4. Duty Violated	Breach of a private duty owed to an individual or defined class of persons.	Breach of a fundamental duty owed to the State and to society as a whole.
5. Consequences	Primary remedy is Damages; also involves equitable remedies like Injunctions. Never results in loss of liberty.	Consequences include imprisonment, fines payable to the State, or community orders.
6. Vicarious Liability	Common, allowing an employer to be held liable for the torts of an employee acting in the course of employment.	Extremely rare; criminal liability is generally attributed only to the individual who committed the act.
7. Overlap (Actionability)	An act can be both a crime and a tort (e.g., assault and battery). In such cases, the State prosecutes the crime, and the victim simultaneously pursues a civil action for damages.	The civil remedy is independent of the criminal prosecution, and the acquittal in one system does not preclude a finding of liability in the other.